Skip to main content

Arbutus Is Granted a Pre-trial Injunction Restraining Acuitas From Entering Into Agreements Sublicensing Arbutus LNP Technology

 

Clinical courses

 

Clinical courses

Arbutus Biopharma Corporation an industry-leading therapeutic solutions company focused on developing a cure for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, announced that the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted Arbutus’ request for a pre-trial injunction against Acuitas, preventing Acuitas from sublicensing Arbutus’ lipid nanoparticle (LNP) technology until the end of October, or further order of the Court.  Under the terms of the pre-trial injunction, Acuitas is prevented from entering into any new agreements which include sublicensing of Arbutus’ LNP.

"We are gratified by the Court’s decision to grant a pre-trial injunction against Acuitas to stop Acuitas from granting unauthorized licenses and use of our LNP technology," said Dr. Mark J. Murray, Arbutus’ President and CEO. "We will continue to defend against unauthorized use of our LNP technology.  Arbutus intends to leverage LNP to generate non-dilutive capital to help fund development of our HBV pipeline.”

Background on Acuitas Cross-License
Consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement signed in November 2012, Arbutus finalized and entered a cross-license agreement with Acuitas in December 2013. The terms of the cross-license agreement provide Acuitas with access to certain of Arbutus’ earlier IP generated prior to mid-April 2010. At the same time, the terms provide Arbutus with access to certain of Acuitas’ technology and licenses in the RNAi field, along with a percentage of each milestone and royalty payment with respect to certain products. To date Acuitas has announced four sub-licenses of the technology to Moderna Therapeutics.

 

Background on Acuitas License Dispute
On August 29, 2016, Arbutus provided Acuitas with notice that Arbutus considered Acuitas to be in material breach of the companies’ cross-license agreement.  The cross-license agreement provides that it may be terminated upon any material breach by the other party 60 days after receipt of written notice of termination describing the material breach in reasonable detail.  On October 25, 2016, Acuitas filed a Notice of Civil Claim in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking an order that Arbutus perform its obligations under the Cross License Agreement, for damages ancillary to specific performance, injunctive relief, interest and costs.  Arbutus disputed Acuitas’ position; and filed a response within the time frame prescribed by the Court.  Arbutus also filed a counterclaim seeking, among other relief, a declaration that the Cross License Agreement had been terminated.  On January 10, 2017, Arbutus filed an application seeking an order to enjoin Acuitas from, inter alia, entering into any further agreements purporting to sublicense Arbutus’ technology from the date of the order to the date of trial or further order from the court.  Acuitas filed a response to Arbutus’ application and the matter was the subject of a hearing on January 26, 2017, which resulted in the Supreme Court of British Columbia granting a pre-trial injunction against Acuitas.

<< Back to Pharma News

Subscribe to PharmaTutor News Alerts by Email